This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games: Nintendo / Characters Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Nintendo task force. This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Low-importance). Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Pokémon Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Fictional characters This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nessa (Pokémon)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 22:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will try to get this one done in the coming days. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs)

1. Prose is well written and is meeting guidelines.

2. Everything in the article is sourced: no original research.

3. The subject is addressed from multiple angles by sources in the article's Reception section.

4. Article is neutral and does not attempt to take a stance on a particular issue or side.

5. Article appears stable. No controversial edits made in the past few days.

6. Article has one fair use image, which has proper rationale under guidelines.

-Add comma after popular in second paragraph. Did this myself since it's a minor fix.

-I'd change "and further escalated" to "which further escalated."

-"This led to online publications to examine the backlash," I'd cut the first "to" here.

-I'd add "is" between "Nessa" and "a Gym Leader."

-I'd add "notably" when it's discussing Drednaw as part of her lineup since otherwise there's not much reason to highlight Drednaw.

-"and recognizes the Feebas she knew has now evolved into a Milotic." I'd change it to clarify that she is recognizing the Milotic as the Feebas having evolved.

-Add was between "and" and "featured" in the second paragraph. Did this myself since it's a minor fix.

-"calling it fire" I'd elaborate on this since fire can be misconstrued here to mean literal fire. Perhaps quotation marks or something similar?

-Remove the semi-colon after Comic Book Resources.

-Is Game Industry News reliable? The reliable sources list comes up as inconclusive but I'd like to make sure there's proper rationale here given it's been debated.

-"Properly illustrated darker colors" Should be illustrate. Done myself since it's a minor fix.

-Add comma after "Sword and Shield" in the same paragraph as above. Done myself since it's a minor fix.

Sources appear overall reliable and the writing quality is good. Once the above issues are addressed I'd be happy to pass this article. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 17:37, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed. Junae Benne is a frequent writer for many publications including PC Gamer, so her article in GiN should be fine to cite for the purposes of this article. (source on Muckrack)--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks all good! Happy to pass! Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]