Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Nantes

Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 28, 2017Peer reviewReviewed
March 18, 2017Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 3, 2017Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 20, 2017Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited

Section title

There are two real options for the name of this section:

  1. Rail / Trains
  2. Intercity rail / Regional rail

I've taken the liberty of going through the other 20 préfectures in continental France to see what their sections are called:

  • Strasbourg - no sub-sections.
  • Bordeaux - split into 'Road', 'Rail', 'Air', 'Trams, buses and boats'.
  • Clermont-Ferrand - no section.
  • Dijon - no section.
  • Rennes - no sub-sections.
  • Orléans - no section.
  • Châlons-en-Champagne - no section.
  • Ajaccio - no sub-sections.
  • Besançon - no sub-sections.
  • Paris - split into 'Streets and thoroughfares', 'Public transportation', 'National and international rail connections', 'National and international air connections'.
  • Montpellier - no sub-sections.
  • Limoges - no section.
  • Metz - split into 'Motorway', 'High speed train (TGV)', 'Regional trains', 'Local transportation'.
  • Toulouse - no sub-sections.
  • Lille - split into 'Highways', 'Air traffic', 'Waterways', 'Shipping statistics'.
  • Caen - no sub-sections.
  • Rouen - no sub-sections.
  • Amiens - no section.
  • Poitiers - no sub-sections.
  • Transport - no sub-sections.
  • Lyon - split into 'Air', 'Rail', 'Road', 'Intercity coach', 'Public transport'.

As you can see, there is no precedent or pattern here. There are two which conform to the way I would wish to leave the section (Paris and Metz), and there are two which conform to the way in which you wish to leave it (Bordeaux and Lyon). I've explained why I think my way is best (i.e. because this section deals specifically with trains going between Nantes and other regions/cities, while the 'Public transport' section deals with commuter/suburban rail), but anyway I'll leave you reply before changing it again. Schcambo 17:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add my 2 cents : "Intercity Rail" seems widely used in articles about cities (except french ones) London, Boston, Los Angeles, so I favor this title. Train is a bad title as it applies to coach, TGV, trams... Mthibault 01:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I realised that "Intercity rail" works better and is more appropriate with the context. I took "Train" from the French article, and it doesn't mean the same thing in English at all, my mistake. Train is simply not precise enough, and today there are numerous kind of trains (subway, tramway, suburban trains...). I'll revert the title and do agree with you on that point. Firstwind —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firstwind (talk • contribs) 16:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History

Article Lead

Is there really a need to know, right in the introduction, that Nantes has a school of management? No? Good, I thought so, which is why I've zapped that bit. I'm also of a mind to get rid of the Times citation (so what if seven years ago some magazine published another one of their unscientific "rankings"), and the bit about some "innovation agency" (what is that anyway) referring to Nantes in some way or another. I just don't want to overdo the trimming, but I find the lead should rely more on "hard" facts, so to speak. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.153.248.80 (talk) 13:20, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

motto

Favet Neptunus eunti. means "Neptune favors the traveler." I realizes it's a find point that few people would care about, but "May Neptune favor the travelers." would be Faveat Neptunus euntibus. --Ioscius ∞ 09:58, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After a quick root around, the poster is correct so I will change the caption accordingly. CaptainScreebo Parley! 18:59, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nantes - Erdre.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Nantes - Erdre.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:32, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Republican Marriage"

I'm removed the reference to the Republican Marriage which is very probably an historical myth created after the fact. This had been introduced by an anonymous edit on http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nantes&diff=prev&oldid=209806479 . The French page about the drownings: fr:Noyades de Nantes has no mentions of "republican marriage", not without reasons, they probably never existed... (the massacres were real, however - I'm keeping the reference to them) --Farialima (talk) 21:42, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Machines of the Isle of Nantes

Since the Isle of Nantes is in Nantes, the following should be included somewhere in this article. However, I was unable to determine which category would be appropriate, and didn't want to create a 'See also' section with only one item.

Perhaps it could be included as part of the narrative in the 'History' section, where the Isle of Nantes is mentioned (?). A related item could (should?) be mentioned someplace in the article - or at least a 'See also' item. See: The Sultan's Elephant -and- Les Machines de l'île Nantes
~Thanks, ~E Modified:74.60.29.141 (talk) 17:37, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Largest Cities in France (Introduction)

Marseilles is the second-largest city in France but is omitted from your list. Dick Kimball (talk) 16:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.airport-technology.com/projects/newnantes/
    Triggered by \bairport-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:29, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nantes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:57, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed complete change to citation/reference format

  • As per the current FAC, I am completely revising the citation/reference format in a personal sandbox. I'm making good progress, but won't be able to finish today. Please do comment here if you object to a complete change. If anyone objects, I will stop (or if I have already done it here in mainspace, I will be willing to revert my changes then). I can probably change it tomorrow if that's OK.
  • By the way, if anyone is certain that the page numbers of Pétré-Grenouilleau, Olivier (2008) match those of Pétré-Grenouilleau, Olivier (2002), we could fix one error that's repeated several times.  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 16:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your attention and your help, it is really appreciated. For Pétré-Grenouilleau, I think that all references should be 2008 actually. I don't know why I put 2002, must have been confused with another book. Oie blanche (talk) 16:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Nantes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:26, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology

Quick question: In the section on the Middle Ages, it included this statement:

After the death of Charlemagne, the Breton armies invaded the March. Nominoe, first Duke of Brittany, seized Nantes in 850. The first decades of Breton rule in Nantes were difficult as Breton lords kept fighting between each other, preventing them to be able to stop Viking incursions. The most spectacular in Nantes occurred in 843, when the Viking warriors killed the bishop.[32] Nantes was finally integrated to the Viking realm in 919, but the Norse were expelled from the town in 937 by Alan II, Duke of Brittany.[33]

Can someone help me figure out where Nominoe should fit into the narrative? It seems like it naturally goes like this:

  1. Charlemagne dies in 817
  2. Britons invade shortly thereafter but fight amongst themselves
  3. Vikings attack in 843
  4. Vikings take over in 919
  5. Vikings expelled in 937

Does Nominoe fight off the Vikings in 850? Or were the Britons *and* Vikings both fighting over the territory in the years preceding 850? – Todorojo (talk) 23:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a message on @Oie blanche:'s French talk page, asking them to come here, as they've done the sourcework for this article. My impression, gleaned from fr:Histoire de Nantes, is that Charlemagne died, Louis II came to the throne. Then there was an attempted coup by Lambert II, heir of a dispossessed Frankish family, of the then-Frankish lands of Brittany (including Nantes), by killing Ricwin of Nantes. Charles the Bald (Charlemagne's grandson, who succeeded Louis II) awarded the land to the wrong person, a Frank. Hell broke loose, and Nominoe, a Breton who was Lambert's ally, united the Bretons against the Franks. There was later a treaty, La paix d'Angers, which created an independent Brittany, which Nominoe's son ruled over as the Duke of Brittany. Vikings attacked in 919, and expelled in 937. The independence of Brittany lasted until a royal marriage was made. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 03:26, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The first Viking raid happened in 843, while the town was still under Frankish control, and the Vikings did not settle. Thus Nominoe fought Franks in 850. Other raids occurred in the period and the Vikings integrated Nantes in their realm in 919. Regards, Oie blanche (talk) 08:40, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clearing that up for us, Oie blanche. Is that information (that the Vikings did not conquer the Franks, and Nominoe later fought the Franks, and under Breton rule the Vikings integrated Nantes in 919) covered in Pétré-Grenouilleau 2008, p. 26? --122.108.141.214 (talk) 09:09, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it is. By the way, I noticed that you made a remark about the sentence on Corbilo. The thing is that this city is mentioned in ancient texts, but these texts are too vague to precisely locate the city. Archeologists have never found its remains. It could have been Nantes, but also Saint-Nazaire, Le Pouliguen or even Ancenis. Oie blanche (talk) 16:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you again - that will make it easier to copyedit. I have tried to include the information you have given us on the page so that it is easy for everyone to understand the timeline. What do you think, @Todorojo:? Oie blanche, so Nantes is one of many candidates that could have been the ancient city of Corbilo? Are the other candidates mentioned in Decours 2006, p. 10.? --122.108.141.214 (talk) 02:48, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's it, Nantes is one of the candidates that could have been Corbilo. I don't have Decours, 2006 with me anymore so I cannot double check the locations, but Pétré-Grenouilleau, 2008, 18, mentions Nantes, Saint-Nazaire and the Grande Brière as possible locations. Oie blanche (talk) 09:35, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again! I have reworded this point to say that Nantes was possibly Corbilo. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 21:35, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nantes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nantes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slavery Memorial

I just added a new section on the Nantes Slavery Memorial but am new to Wikipedia and am not sure I did everything right. Please feel free to go through and edit/fix any issues, thanks! :) Sirbubble (talk) 21:30, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nantes