This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: West Bengal Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Low-importance). Buddhism Mid‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Tibet Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Splitting into separate pages could be a good idea. One notable gain would be that "Namgyal", the name of Sikkim's former royal family, would not redirect to a Tibetan monastery or two. Robin Patterson 14:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The articles exist now, so I made put them under "See also". Davin7 (talk) 08:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citations generally don't belong in articles' introductory sections; but both my edits to this page introduce them there, precisely because I think the matter of the date of the monastery's establishment should be a simple enough matter of fact to establish as such, but hopefully more likely to be so if it's seen as being unestablished by those who will know more than I do relatively "up front". Xeltifon (talk) 01:35, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've since removed the aforementioned citations from the introduction by creating the sections "Early Years" and "Since 1959". That leaves a mere four centuries or thereabouts to fill in, for anyone who knows more about this than I do.  :^) :^) Xeltifon (talk) 08:02, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to leave my edit to stand, for the time being, based on Barry Bryant's published statement (in Wheel of Time) that Phende Lekshe Ling (the monastery which would later come to be called Namgyal) was established in 1564 or 1565 by the 3rd Dalai Lama, but must point out that Namgyal Monastery's Institute of Buddhist studies mentions Gyalwa Gedun Gyatso, the 2nd Dalai Lama, as Namgyal's founder^[1]. Xeltifon (talk) 07:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Namgyal Monastery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121201055206/http://www.namgyal.org/blessings/cyberspace.cfm to http://www.namgyal.org/blessings/cyberspace.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]