The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mudflap → Mudflap (automotive) — A short reason for page name change. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.142.152.104 (talk) 13:54, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• No reason given for the move, but a new dab page would be better. It can be linked through an {{otheruses}} hatnote. talk 15:20, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose no need for a move with only two entities called "mudflap". Just use hatnotes. — AjaxSmack 03:17, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose this "Transformers"-IP-editor never leaves a reason, and never seems to read his/her talk page. All his/her move requests should be automatically denied. 70.29.210.155 (talk) 04:54, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support move this page and add the disambiguation page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.142.152.104 (talk) 13:34, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - No rationale given for move, and it shouldn't be moved. I have struck out the IP's attempt to !vote unsigned (I presume the thought process was that nobody would notice the request and the !vote came from the same IP). --Sable232 (talk) 21:38, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - No rationale given for move, and nothing better to replace it with. DMahalko (talk) 23:08, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move. To me the primary meaning is ordinary mudflap. Let page Mudflap be the disambig page. What are the figures for people accessing each of these pages? The incoming links to page Mudflap seem to be mostly from automotive related pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.142.152.104 (talk) 00:33, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page not moved: speedy close. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:32, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mudflap → Mudflap (automotive) — Mudflap will be turn into a disambiguation page. 75.142.152.104 (talk) 23:28, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose and speedy close. Nothing to disambiguate; the related article at Mudflap girl does not require disambiguation, which leaves us with this article and Mudflap (Transformers). This article is the clear primary meaning, and the existing hatnotes deal perfectly well with the other articles. The proposer has a long record of raising similar moves, none of them successful, and several warnings and one block for disruptive editing, and has been asked nicely to read the policy. See also Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive635#Talk:White Rabbit. Andrewa (talk) 00:20, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh never mind, we don't create at Mudflap (disambiguation) and no move. 75.142.152.104 (talk) 00:47, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • I think that's the only reasonable outcome, especially considering this is the second attempt you have made at this exact move this year (see #Requested move (May 2010) above), and on this occasion you have offered no arguments at all in its favour, let alone any new ones. Please read WP:DAB#Deciding to disambiguate and justify any proposed new disambiguation pages in terms of it. Andrewa (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Support based on my review of the 17 incoming links. They are about equally divided between references to vehicle mud flaps (with and without the girl) and the Transformer character Mudflap. Hatnotes are a hack. It is better to fix the incoming links, and when incoming links need fixing a disambiguation page is appropriate. 69.3.72.9 (talk) 15:46, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Once Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mudflap (disambiguation) is created, move the article about mud flaps over the redirect Mud flap and move the disambiguation page to Mudflap. 69.3.72.9 (talk) 15:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Now that Mudflap (disambiguation) exists, I support moving the article at Mudflap to Mud flap and moving the disambiguation page to Mudflap. 69.3.72.9 (talk) 18:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Do you have any rationale for moving Mudflap to Mud flap? Even if such a move were desirable, one should redirect to the other, so I would oppose this also. PC78 (talk) 18:52, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, I do. Unlike many incoming links to Mudflap, incoming links to Mud flap all intend mud flaps, and "mud flap" is the usual term for these things. 69.3.72.9 (talk) 21:10, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Mudflap and Mud flap refer to the same common real world object. One should redirect to the other, and both should have priority over a Transformers character. PC78 (talk) 08:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IMO the DAB should be deleted, but I'm not sure I can be bothered. It does no great damage. See Talk:Mudflap (disambiguation)#A sad history. Andrewa (talk) 07:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. This article is quite clearly the primary topic as opposed to the character. PC78 (talk) 17:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• How so? I don't think there is any primary topic here. 69.3.72.9 (talk) 17:26, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• You're joking, I assume? PC78 (talk) 17:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose WP:PRIMARYUSAGE in the REAL WORLD is the automotive part, not the toy. 76.66.197.151 (talk) 00:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia page view statistics for August 2010 suggest that if there is any primary topic here then it is the transformer character. 69.3.72.9 (talk) 01:19, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 134 Mud flap
• 885 Mudflap
• 2768 Mudflap girl
• 9962 Mudflap (Transformers)

• A good job then that page view statistics "may help to support the determination of a primary topic in a discussion, but are not determining factors". PC78 (talk) 08:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose The automotive part is the primary usage, like it or not. I see no convincing evidence that, without context, the word "mudflap" refers to the Transformer. The page statistics may just reflect a systemic bias towards fan culture and against the automotive services industry. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 20:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. Ask 100 people on the street what comes to mind when you say "mudflap," the vast majority will know it as the automotive part.
• Also support banning the nominator from wasting editors' time by continually making these frivolous move requests. --Sable232 (talk) 20:28, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post them a polite warning, which both gives them the chance to review their behaviour and is a necessary part of the case for a ban if it does come to that, see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct. See also the discussion concerning this user's behaviour recently started by another IP at User talk:Andrewa#Talk:Mudflap and feel free to comment there. Andrewa (talk) 20:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.