This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

France This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Polynesia: French Polynesia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the French Polynesia work group (assessed as High-importance).

I see, digging through the edit history that the article did indeed start out as a one-line stub (by User:Dirtbiscuit) with the CE spelling "neighbouring", and then that the article was greatly expanded (by User:Bryan Derksen) who used exclusively AmE spellings. Then Bryan went and created the article Fangataufa, again using exclusively AmE spellings. So, for "consistency" "neighbouring" should have been changed to "neighboring", based on the sheer number of AmE spellings used, but for "argument reduction", all the AmE spellings should have been changed to Commonwealth spellings, eventhough doing so would lead to this article being CE and Fangataufa being AmE. As it happens, despite the mini editwar between me and User:Rama, "neighbouring" has weathered the storm and remains in the article.  :-/ Tomer ^TALK 22:43, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

"Greatly expanded" ... lol, is that what you wikipedia guys call ripping content wholesale from another publication? This entire entry is just pure plagiarism without even the decency of a credit.

Much of the content of the current lead appears to be information for navigators wishing to enter the lagoon. This material should not be on Wikipedia at all, let alone in the lead. That Moruroa was the site of 189 French nuclear tests is of incomparably greater global interest. Is there any reason not to delete the navigational material? -- mglg_(talk) 22:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since nobody has explained any reason to keep it, I'm removing the extraneous navigational information.--mglg_(talk) 00:01, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed the following line:

A sign of the discomfort this matter still causes the French Government is that the Atoll cannot be found in Google Earth search functions.^{[citation needed]}

At january 1st 2008 i could find mururoa with Google Maps. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.145.81.165 (talk • contribs)

Note that while other atolls in the Tuamotu archipelago have hi rez imagery, Mururoa and Fangataufa happen to lack it for the nuclear test locations. (How convinient for the French Goverment.)91.154.95.31 (talk) 12:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering whether there is any correlation to the current long term drought in Australia to the long term environmental effects of the underground testings at Mururoa and its surrounding areas. Is there a governmental coverup occurring? We're told that it's all green house gas related but surely the testing has something to do with ocean temperatures and currents. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shelrielf (talk • contribs) 00:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Italian chemist and researcher Corrado Malanga no nuclear explosion happened in Mururoa. Instead, a huge underwater alien base was created in cooperation with the French military.
Does anyone knows more about this theory? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.24.147.188 (talk) 10:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This seems reasonable - --Viifog 14 Dec 2011 —Preceding undated comment added 09:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

There is uncertainty over the number of explosions - both 181 and 175 are reported. The two sentences giving these numbers are contradictory. It should simply be stated that the number of tests has been variously reported as 175 and 181.203.184.41.226 (talk) 18:21, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Lenny (talk) 02:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Moruroa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130926093601/http://www.com.univ-mrs.fr/IRD/atollpol/irdpoly/uksalv85.htm to http://www.com.univ-mrs.fr/IRD/atollpol/irdpoly/uksalv85.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723050155/http://www.mururoavet.com/ to http://www.mururoavet.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]