The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus that Miligram should be retargeted through a WP:RFD discussion. Favonian (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miligram (band) → Miligram – There is not any other page with title beginning Miligram; please, check disambiguation. --5.43.76.74 (talk) 12:44, 20 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisted. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 16:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nom. Hatnote needs to stay to avoid confusion with the unit of measurement. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 18:57, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose It took me a lot of squinting to even see the misspelling here. While we generally prioritize correct spellings over incorrect ones I doubt the band is really the primary topic. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Question: Should we also list the redirect at RfD? Might be the best venue to determine the primary topic for "miligram". Jruderman (talk) 22:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per Pppery. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:33, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nom. I think the hatnote sufficiently deals with the problem of misspelling of the unit and from some searching it doesn't appear to be a common misspelling. The band is the primary topic D1551D3N7 (talk) 21:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Insanity: Are we sure the primary topic isn't actually the concept of typosquatting? Jruderman (talk) 04:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. Recommend an RFD for Miligram to retarget to the primary topic Milligram. 162 etc. (talk) 19:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, the more I think about it, the more I think RFD is the right venue. Support close as Wrong venue (or Changed venue, without prejudice as to whether it was wrong to raise the question here. Jruderman (talk) 19:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose I think we're focusing on a minor detail here, renaming the whole article isn't necessary just for that. Waqar💬 19:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]