This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Microsoft Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Video games Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Organized Labour Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

• The 996.icu movement, which was hosted on GitHub with lot of support from MSFT employees.
• Works council in Germany. (non primary source would be better)^[1]
• Expand coverage of anti government contract protests/actions ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 13:58, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend recasting the proseline text into a cohesive narrative before nominating for peer review as it almost certainly will come up there. czar 13:15, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Microsoft and unions/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Shushugah (talk · contribs) 22:51, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: TheGhostGum (talk · contribs) 14:22, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing this and IBM and unions. In case you want similar formats, Tesla and unions is a WP:Featured articles and Apple and unions is GA. Always happy for general feedback of these article structures, and rest of your feedback. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 00:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review Pending