This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

I've blanked the page since it was entirely unsourced. Please add sources for anything before re-inserting anything, per Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. -- Jonel | Speak 18:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See this BLP Noticeboard report. AvB ÷ talk 23:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WAS 4.250 added a bunch of sources to the article. If the problem is that lack of sourcing, it would appear to me that the problem has been solved. So what is the reason you blanked it this time, Avb? - TexasAndroid 23:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for alerting me to this. When I didn't see the required in-line cites (<ref>...</ref> references), I didn't scroll down far enough to see the list of refs added below the article body. I will self-revert for now on the assumption that the article is fully supported by the provided sources. I can't guarantee though that others will leave it in place since the assertions in the article still need to be linked directly to the relevant portions of the sources per WP:BLP and especially the WP:CITE guideline. Once in-line cites have been added, the article can be reviewed regarding any remaining WP:BLP issues. Until then, the WP:BLPN report should remain open. AvB ÷ talk 23:59, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Louise Lanctôt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140303204541/http://www.mcgill.ca/files/maritimelaw/C.doc to https://www.mcgill.ca/files/maritimelaw/C.doc
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130727120045/http://www.mcgill.ca/files/maritimelaw/D.doc to https://www.mcgill.ca/files/maritimelaw/D.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]