This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

British Overseas Territories This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Museums Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Africa: Saint Helena Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Saint Helena work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Should not Longwood House be considered a jerry-built mason? I have read that the inside of the building is still so wet that they have to repaper it every other year. The wallpapers refuse to stick on the walls! However, my source to this claim is no longer available. Anyone who can verify?

2009-06-10 Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden.

On Extraterritoriality#Current_examples this house is mentioned as example of extraterritorial land. I presume under French control. However, it is not mentioned at the article, and the article suggests there are two other spaces on the island that may have the same status, if it has any status indeed. Could someone more into the topic confirm the status, and clarify it in the article? Thanks! effeietsanders 15:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In British times, there neither is nor ever was something extraterritorial there. Saint H is a British possession and thus British, and just that a foreign entity owns soil and building over there is the claim to exactly nothing. Great Britain's law books apply, and the state of France is just the owner and landlord of a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C0:DF19:A200:3DF8:D794:34DE:BEDC (talk) 01:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonathunder: You seem to have started this article back in the days, perhaps you have an idea? effeietsanders 09:27, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I remember being fascinated by the idea of little islands of France on Saint Helena when I read a book, long ago, which discussed this. I don't remember which book it was, but I'm sure there must be sources out there. I will look. Jonathunder (talk) 00:56, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Found it: Napoleon & Betsy: Recollections of the Emperor Napoleon on St Helena, Lucia Elizabeth Abell, 2012, page 73. "In 1858, Longwood House and the Valley of the Tomb were" sold to France, along with the Briars. One "condition of the transfer was that the French Government should appoint a representative responsible for their upkeep. From that date onwards a French Honorary Consul has resided on the Island."

So the Briars, Longwood House, and the area where Napoleon was buried (for a time) are at least nominally French possessions, with a status something like that of an honorary consulate. Jonathunder (talk) 01:18, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Longwood House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150510180638/http://www.domfrance.helanta.sh/index_files/Page420.htm to http://www.domfrance.helanta.sh/index_files/Page420.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:40, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]