Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Local Government Commission for England (1958–1967)

Discussion

The Times of September 6, 1962 mentions a proposal by the chairman of West Riding County Council to have a single Yorkshire County Council, noting that the population of Yorkshire minus county boroughs is less than Lancashire. Morwen - Talk 07:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

and December 15, 1965, has details of the provisional reports for Merseyside/SELNEC.

In SELNEC is proposes a "new county of nearly 500 square miles [...] and a population of more than 2,500,000". there would be nine boroughs within this

  • Manchester, with Manchester Airport
  • Salford, Eccles, Swinton and Pendlebury, Prestwich, Irlam, Worsley, Kearsley, Whitefield
  • Stretford, Urmston, Altrincham, Sale, Hale, Bowdon, Carrington and Partington
  • Stockport, Bredbury and Romiley, Cheadle and Gatley, Hazel Grove and Bramhall, Marple, Wilmslow, Alderley Edge and Disley
  • Ashton-under-Lyne, Dunkinfield, Hyde, Stalybridge, Mossley, Audenshaw, Droylsden, Longdendale, Denton, Denton, Tintwistle, Glossop, Chapel-en-le-Frith
  • Oldham, Chadderton, Crompton, Failsworth, Lees, Royston, Saddleworth
  • Rochdale, Heywood, Littleborough, Middleton, Milnrow, Wardle, Whitworth
  • Bury, Radcliffe, Whitefield, Tottington, Ramsbottom
  • Bolton, Farnworth, Horwich, Kearsley, Little Lever, Turton and Westhoughton

it doesn't recommend anything near so radical in Merseyside, recommendations include "the extension of Bootle county borough to take in Litherland, Crosby" and "creation of a new urban district based on Maghull".

Morwen - Talk 08:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

and October 27, 1965 has the draft proposals for the north-west:

  • Barrow-in-Furness to become non-county borough (strongly disliked by its council)
  • extensions to boundaries of Blackburn, Blackpool, Burnley, Carlisle, Chester, Preston, St Helens, Southport, Warrington, Wigan.

"suggestions that Westmorland - in population the second smallest English county - should be merged with Cumberland and the Furness area of Lancashire to form a county of "Cumbria" are ruled out". Interesting to note opposition to this proposal comes mainly from Westmorland not from Cumberland. Morwen - Talk 08:14, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2, 1960 has the draft proposals for East Midlands and West Midlands. These are quite interesting

  • Huntingdonshire, Isle of Ely, Soke of Peterborough and Cambridge division to be joined to form a single new county of Cambridgeshire
    • except that Cambridge would constitute a county borough
  • Luton to be made a county borough
  • Stamford to be included in the new Cambridgeshire
  • Rutland to be abolished. Ketton Rural District -> Cambridgeshire, rest to Leicestershire
  • Royston, Hertfordshire also to Cambs
  • St Neots and area to Bedfordshire from Hunts/Cambs
  • extension of Leicester and Northampton CBs
  • Linslade transferred from Bucks to Beds

Black Country has proposals for county boroughs:

  • Dudley, with Brierley Hill, most of Sedgley
  • Smethwick with Halesowen, Oldbury and Rowley Regis
  • West Bromwich with Tipton and Wednesbury, most of Darleston
  • Wallsall, most of WIllenhall
  • Wolverhampton, Bilston, Wednesfield

Cosley to be split between Dudley/West Bromwich/Wolverhampton.

  • Solihull to become county borough
  • Stourbridge and Amblecote to be merged to form non-county borough in Worcestershrie
  • Alridge-Brownhills in Staffordshire

"special authority" to be set up to cover entire region

  • Burton upon Trent and Worcester to become non-county boroughs
  • extensions for Coventry and Stoke
  • "transfer to Staffordshire of a large part of Tamworth Rural District"

June 6, 1961 has the report on the revised proposals for WMids special review area: has a rather fantastic map showing the old borders vs the new Morwen - Talk 08:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

and not strictly related, but September 19, 1961 has a couple of new towns being proposed at Swynnerton and Woofferton, whcih never happened. Morwen - Talk 08:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

February 2, 1966, has a "How Local Government Areas Stand Today - Work of Discontinued Commission" - explaining what is going on with the proposals the commission did make. Burton upon Trent launched a High Court action to save itself, Worcester was abandoned. "decision not to amalgamate Rutland with Leicestershire announced in August 1963". Cheltenham demotion also abandoned. Morwen - Talk 09:03, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why recommendations for reform were not acted on/delayed

Many recommendations were not acted upon. Tony Bryne (1994) notes the following as reasons for delays/no action in the period from 1945 up to 1965/74:

  • cost of reorganisation - there wasn't the money
  • pressure on legislative timetables
  • the war and reconstruction got in the way
  • general public were apathetic to reform
  • lack of consensus for alternative proposals (all met with some appeal or repugnance)
  • arguments over efficiency vs. democracy (large vs. small units)
  • Governments knew some areas of local government would be alienated by change and were reluctant to loose influence
  • Fears that changes to boundaries would affect party performance

I'm not sure where this could/should go but it might explain why so much effort was spent without much change. MRSC 15:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment added by anon IP

An anon IP added this to the "The Review process" section:

The data in the above table is not wholly accurate - it is worth cross referencing it with Stanyer in wiseman, Local Government

I presume this means the following:

Stanyer, J., 'The Local Government Commissions', in HV Wiseman (ed.), Local Government in England: 1958-69, London, 1970, pp. 15-35.

Anyone have a copy to check? The dates in the existing table come from the Lonodon Gazette and press announcements in contemporary media. Lozleader (talk) 10:50, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Local Government Commission for England (1958–1967). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Local_Government_Commission_for_England_(1958%E2%80%931967)