Talk:Full stop law
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. I will add that this was consensus in this discussion. But the sources indicate other spellings including 'Full Stop Law', 'Full Stop law' and some versions with a hyphen. So, if one of these other versions is more correct, then a follow up nomination is probably needed. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Ley de Punto Final → Full stop law – Name in English. Cambalachero (talk) 19:38, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose – where did this translation come from? It doesn't even make sense without a hyphen (full-stop law). Dicklyon (talk) 07:08, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- See here. It is not used with a hypen. Cambalachero (talk) 17:28, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support, English, without hyphen, without Spanish, well supported in Google Books. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Title update
The law's name is a proper name and should be in capital letters - Full Stop not Full stop. This is both correct grammar and supported by the sources. This was suggested as potentially needing follow up during the page move (see comments in the move section). Any objections? MartinezMD (talk) 16:15, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Full stop law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120530140552/www.nuncamas.org/document/nacional/ley23492.htm to http://www.nuncamas.org/document/nacional/ley23492.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)