This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article was accepted from this draft on 28 April 2023 by reviewer NP83 (talk· contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns
The Orlando Sentinel is a reliable source and the articles posted are about the man from seminole county florida 2603:9001:1E00:180E:7454:6752:F826:4AC4 (talk) 14:02, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In brief, users who are personally connected to a topic are expected to leave their biases "at the door", even if the article is about them personally, even if it has been vandalized, and even if it is very difficult to remain neutral. Fixing a problematic article is good; asking others to fix it is good too. Fixing it with bias, or in the sense of "I want my biography to read this way", can be a problem. Ultimately the article's content is a communal decision, not just one person's view.
In such circumstances it is important to read the guidelines above
carefully. If you want to do more than remove a clear and obvious breach of the content policies, then
why are you redacting comments? Are you scared of the truth coming out? Everything posted is true and accurate. 2603:9001:1E00:180E:7454:6752:F826:4AC4 (talk) 21:01, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I am the author of this page. They redacted some of your comments and edits because they are not constructive and don't comply with the rules of Wikipedia. You've declared a conflict of interest about the subject, and therefore anything cited has to come from a reliable source, not your own words.
The subject shares a common name with others. Unless it can be proven that it is the same person, it cannot be included. Do you have a reliable source that significantly links the information you want to include? Please keep the comments constructive and only refer to what reliable sources include. –Filmforme (talk) 22:25, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
X
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung