This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

I can't believe that this guy's wikipedia page has ZERO RESULTS when searched for "children". It was found as fact by a trial court, reaffirmed by an appellate court, and that reaffirmation was affirmed by another appellate court. It all factual, government-sourced information, zero validity issues at all whatsoever. But before I add it. . . educate me as to what I must be missing here. . . ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.110.115.4 (talk) 09:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP. This is especially so in this case because there are allegations and Klayman's denials. A BLP-compliant version would have to include many details and specifics, to properly frame that the initial court's finding was inferred from Klayman's refusal to answer certain questions. In addition, the court's findings were published in newspapers, and Klayman promptly sued them for defamation. Yes, the newspapers eventually won, but defending lawsuits isn't free. --Weazie (talk) 19:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this topic was twice discussed in the archives; one discussion linked to a BLP-noticeboard discussion about Klayman. --Weazie (talk) 19:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]