This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining
I propose merging to the "Knox Dolomite" to the "Knox Supergroup"~~ for the following reasons.
1) "Knox Dolomite" is part of the Knox Supergroup and is not even the proper nomenclature for the rock unit being described.
2) The body of this article was a copy and paste from another article by the same author, this is evident because it is describing the "Kerbal Formation" formation not the "Knox Dolomite"
3) There are no valid references for this article.
Zigismon (talk) 20:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree, 1) that same rational could be extended to virtually any formation article that is part of a group 2) that could and has been easily be fixed 3) the same could be said for all formation articles that almost solely rely on fossilworks/palaeodb (often broken or outdated). Lavalizard101 (talk) 10:53, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
