This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tibet Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. China Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Former countries This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country

The article has a lot of material that is sourced from travel and trekking guidebooks. These are secondary sources and should be replaced with the original/primary sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.232.211.130 (talk) 19:51, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may not be using the term in the same way that is used around here, but secondary sources (as we define them) are preferred. See WP:SECONDARY. If what you mean is that more scholarly secondary sources would be better, I agree with you completely, but we are sometimes restricted to what we can access. You are very welcome to improve the sourcing in the article by bringing in reliable sources. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:14, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have suggested moving the article Dêgê to Derge. If that occurs, I would also like to move this article to Kingdom of Derge. See Talk:Dêgê#Requested move.—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 14:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kingdom of Derge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090131155038/http://rmanyc.org:80/programs-events/situ-panchen.xml?context=programs-events/situ-panchen.xml to http://www.rmanyc.org/programs-events/situ-panchen.xml?context=programs-events/situ-panchen.xml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]