This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: European / Nordic This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  European military history task force Nordic military history task force Norway This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hi Eilev G. Myhren - I friendly-reverted/removed your paragraph only because it was slightly off-topic and not directly related to the Uprising itself. Maybe you should start a page on Norwegian Capital Punishment as it is a relevant topic to Norwegian History. What we need are some solid sources for the page. Compare and contrast of different rebellions would be doing individual research Take Care... Dinkytown (talk) 01:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One will note that the existing law prescribing capital punishment at the time dated back to 1685. The 1814 constitution had not changed it. Capital punishment was not removed from Norwegian jurisdiction for another 30 years. The ruling body at the time was still a relic from the Dano-Norwegian union, and it is fair to say that the Sami rebels were punished the same way as Norwegian rebels would have been a hundred years before. In fact, Norwegian rebellions had been far more violent in their time.

The "rebellion" was in fact a manifestation of religious madness brought on by a small sect started by three brothers who believed they were Jesus Christ and God himself. It was a Sami on Sami conflict as they thought to convert by violence the others to their sect. This was admitted later in court by the leaders. Trying to spin it as a rebellion against authorities goes against everything the sources say. 80.197.107.218 (talk) 09:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Rebellion" is the term generally used to describe the event. See [1].--Ipigott (talk) 08:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kautokeino rebellion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713174344/http://www.kulturkompasset.com/index.php?AID=858&TID=2 to http://www.kulturkompasset.com/index.php?AID=858&TID=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]