This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Skyscrapers High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Right now, it is just a huge holde in the ground as they dig the foundations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.47.66.50 (talk) 14:25, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Google Earth has built a 3D model of it and put it in the wrong place. They put it on the construction site of the MixC Mall extension. Oh, and it's STILL just a big hole in the ground (albeit with some signs of concrete foundations). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.246.45.199 (talk) 09:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{geodata-check}} The coordinates need the following fixes: 22°32'47.58"N 114° 6'6.63"E

113.89.156.90 (talk) 13:29, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. BrainMarble (talk) 02:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason, at the time of writing, when you click on the new image I uploaded it loads the previous one (!) Maybe I have to wait for Wikipedia to re-index itself or something ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Malau (talk • contribs) 08:37, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like the fusion of king, kinky, and key. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 05:11, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KK100. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110227215235/http://paper.sznews.com/szdaily/20100912/ca2937214.htm to http://paper.sznews.com/szdaily/20100912/ca2937214.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]