This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Evolutionary biology This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Women scientists Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Ecology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. LGBTQ+ studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies Women writers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2019 and 30 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rsmorehouse17. Peer reviewers: Kaitmeade, Carleyg98.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's worth mentioning in the article itself, but is Joan Roughgarden related to a current professor in Computer Science at Stanford University named Tim Roughgarden? 128.12.18.122 (talk) 06:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Joan sounds like a woman of great wit, courage and patience. Perhaps the clean-up tag is fair. I'd prefer to say Joan is notable on many counts and the article should do her more justice, including fair reporting of criticisms. I don't mean to suggest any bias, I mean only to suggest there is more information out there (even in the links already provided). Hopefully we'll get to work and expand this to be a fascinating article on a fascinating woman, and/or person. She will certainly stretch our use of pronouns. ;) Alastair Haines 09:18, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Living person, non-notable, non-public figure, her claims about sexual selection are debunked (thus are not notable contributions), her book about reconciling evolution with Catholicism is fringe at best, and this article reads more or less like a curriculum vitae and a source of publicity for her. --70.131.82.165 (talk) 04:24, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This suggestion does not seem appropriate. Roughgarden is a very well known scientist at a major university. Just check Google Scholar to see how often her papers are cited, to get a hold of her influence in science. About her Theory of Sexual Selection, the very fact that so many scientists reacted to it, makes it worthwhile aspect to report in Wikipedia.

That said, there is of course room for improving the article and in particular describing her contributions in more detail. Mashkin (talk) 09:07, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nomination, 70. However, as Mashkin says, this person is notable under Wikipedia's established guidelines. Whilst the article needs clean-up, it would not be deleted by the AfD process (at least not for the reasons you have given) so I must decline the request to list it at this time. Contact me if you have other reasons or want more information. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ has nothing to declare except his jeans 14:19, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Mashkin and ❝ЯEDVERS❞. While, yes, Roughgarden's more recent work on sexual selection is not widely accepted within the scientific community, she is well-known in ecological circles for some classic studies on rocky shore ecology. Notability is pretty clear-cut here (though I do say that as a biologist). Cheers, --PLUMBAGO 14:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Her book about reconciling evolution with Catholicism is fringe at best" - Isn't that called a bias? 98.198.83.12 (talk) 14:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Joan Roughgarden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071008183805/http://www.fccb.org/programs/details.php?eventID=190 to http://www.fccb.org/programs/details.php?eventID=190
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100713195521/https://www.californiasciencecenter.org/GenInfo/NewsAndEvents/SpecialPrograms/ScienceMatters/Religion/Bio.php?bio=roughgarden to http://www.californiasciencecenter.org/GenInfo/NewsAndEvents/SpecialPrograms/ScienceMatters/Religion/Bio.php?bio=roughgarden

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

She is best known for her rejection of sexual selection and her theistic evolutionism.

Her rejection of sexual selection doesn’t seem like a ideal sentence. This source states that Over the last 130 years, research has established that (a) sexual selection exists and is widespread in the plant and animal kingdoms So at this point denying sexual selection is like denying evolution. Her denial of sexual selection is just fringe.CycoMa (talk) 21:44, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]