Jeni Bojilova-Pateva has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 12, 2019 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 26, 2019. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Jeni Bojilova-Pateva became a women's rights activist when she was barred from teaching because she was married?
	Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 1, 2019, and December 1, 2022.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). Bulgaria Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Feminism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Red: Focus on Suffrage (2019) This article was created or improved during the Focus on Suffrage initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2019. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

If someone ends up finding sources soon it would be good to expand this because the importance isn't really clear as is. Coralshin (talk) 19:32, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also count not find sources via Google. Tripnoted (talk) 05:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the new source is very similar the works section... Tripnoted (talk) 06:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thank you tweet! Victuallers (talk) 09:37, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jeni Bojilova-Pateva/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 18:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to review this tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

"

• "After graduating with teaching credentials she began her profession, but was barred from teaching when a law was passed limiting married women's rights. She turned to activism and journalism, becoming involved in the international women's movement." - dates?  Done SusunW (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• " Her book В помощ на жената (To Help Women) -year?  Done SusunW (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Career

• " began giving talks on the" -began as an orator for ?  Done SusunW (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Italicize the names of the newspapers in English. "The situation of woman and child in Bulgaria" -should be capitalized as a title in English too.  Done SusunW (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• "In 1909, she published an article in the newspaper Ден (Day) arguing for women's emancipation and in 1910, " -and the following year? -to avoid being repetitive with citing dates.  Done SusunW (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy

" She is remembered, along with Anna Karima, as one of the "two most prominent leaders of the women's movement" in their era." -really? If it's a quote state who it's by.  Done SusunW (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SusunW: Well done, nice to see you expanding existing articles too.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:21, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dr. Blofeld for the review, yes, as long as it isn't someone where drive-by trivial content is repeatedly added, I enjoy cleaning up articles. This one was a joy to do as I learned a lot while writing it. SusunW (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Nice one.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible to divide the "Career" section into subsections? Right now it consists of 1,748 words, out of a total of 2,175 words (80% of the article). Subsections might make it easier to read. AmericanLemming (talk) 21:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AmericanLemming "anyone can edit", but I've tried to break it up. Is it easier for you now? SusunW (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That's much better. AmericanLemming (talk) 21:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

de nada SusunW (talk) 21:46, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]