This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips Military history: Aviation / Maritime / Asian / Japanese / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Maritime warfare task force Asian military history task force Japanese military history task force World War II task force Japan: Military history Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 20:54, December 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force. WikiProject Japan to do list: Peer review: None A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles

Needs infobox, and probably a degree of expansion. LordAmeth 19:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There appears to be a typo in the Armor, Armament,... section of this article.

Her deck armor above the magazines was 25 millimeters (0.98 in) thick, but the deck above the magazines was 56 millimeters (2.2 in) thick

What is the difference between deck armor and deck? What is the thickness of armor over the engine spaces and over the magazines?? Fred4570 (talk) 21:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese aircraft carrier Unryū/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 02:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Did she have 13 or 16 twin 25 mm AA guns? The text and infobox don't match. The low range on the belt also differs between body and infobox.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	the description of File:Japanese aircraft carrierUnryu.jpg is in Japanese. A translation (even a machine one) really is needed so that non-Japanese literate users can read it and understand the data. Also needs a US tag.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	On hold for seven days for discrepancies between the infobox and body text, and image licensing, to be sorted out Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 04:23, 11 December 2015 (UTC) Passing, as comments have been addressed. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 04:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching these.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. Passing. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 04:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]