This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fashion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Celts Low‑importance Irish clothing is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Ireland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alpaca? No. removing vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.54.226.70 (talk) 18:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this article has multiple issues - lots! I'd be willing to help improve it, but I am overwhelmed by the enormity of the topic. How can I cover a topic as large as Irish Clothing when Mairead Dunlevy has written an entire book on the subject and still could not include much detail? The Wikipedia help page on "scope" says that the scope is determined by consensus. So lets talk.

1. Should this topic even be attempted? There is no "English Clothing" page, just a category page that brings all the English clothing topics together. Would it be best to get rid of this page and just use the Irish clothing category page to connect related pages?

2. If this page is kept, should it be arranged chronologically by time period? Or should it be arranged by article of clothing: cloaks, caps, jumpers, etc.

3. Maybe both approaches: History of clothing followed by Irish articles of clothing of note: Aran sweater, Galway Shawl, etc.

4. If I outlined the time periods, could I get a volunteers who would take on a time period so that no one person has to write it all?

5. I've already written an article on The Galway Shawl and the Kinsale Cloak. There is a good article (not on this page) on the Aran jumper. Would continuing to write on smaller topics be the best approach, and just leave this page as it for now?

Thanks for your input. --LynnMGallagher (talk) 05:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)LynnMGallagher[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Irish clothing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160328103204/http://www.reconstructinghistory.com/articles/irish-articles/what-is-traditional-irish-dress.html to http://www.reconstructinghistory.com/articles/irish-articles/what-is-traditional-irish-dress.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article presently says the following, without a source:

In fact, sumptuary portion of the brehon law decreed that slaves could only wear cloaks with one color, while freemen could wear four and kings wore several different colors.

Aside from the fact that any addition to Wikipedia beging with "In fact" almost always ends up being not a fact but some drive-by user's random opinion, this particular claim sounds suspiciously like Victorian-era repetition of a story about Eochaid Étgudach, a legendary king of around 1537 and 1155 BC, who was said to have passed a sumptuary law along these lines during his very short alleged reign. It is simply old folklore, though repeated as if factual by some credulous Victorian writers like James Logan in The Scottish Gaël (1831), and one later author, Adam Frank in The Clans, Septs, and Regiments of the Scottish Highlands (1908), just parroting from Logan. It has nothing at all to do with any actual history of medieval and later Irish garb (for which, in great detail, see H.F. McClintock Old Irish and Highland Dress, 1950). An actual sumptuary law along these lines in attested, surviving brehon law would be remarkable, and certainly requires reliable sourcing.

THe original legend is covered here:

• Macalister, R. A. Stewart; Murphy, Michael, eds. (2008). Lebor Gabála Érenn: The Book of the Taking of Ireland (PDF). Vol. Part VI: Index D–F. University College Cork. "Eochu Édgathach" entry. Retrieved 10 June 2023 – via CELT: Corpus of Electronic Texts.

If a solid source for this probable nonsense is not forthcoming soon, I'm going to delete the above materialf from the article.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  14:06, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a section in the Senchus Mór which says that what colors of clothing a boy is allowed to wear is restricted based on his father's rank. ex only the sons of kings are allowed to wear blue and purple. One recension mentions that sons of the highest rank should have clothes with gold and silver embroidery, which presumably means that those garments would have at least 3 colors on them. The Senchus Mór does not explicitly assign number of colors worn by rank however, nor does it mention slaves.

I think deleting this passage is reasonable.

(Also, the only translation I have for the Senchus Mór passage is the O'Donovan et al 1865 version which I don't consider a good source. Apparently, none of O'Donovan et al actually knew Old Irish) Wanderingspark (talk) 04:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]