This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC This article was accepted from this draft on 2 October 2023 by reviewer Vaticidalprophet (talk · contribs). Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. Autism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Disability Ido Kedar is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability

Made a start on this draft, attempted to get it into a state that meets WP:GNG. Specifically included:

• Significant coverage. Wide range, some in-depth bios (eg LA Times bio), a variety of citations in academic and professional articles.
• Several independent, reliable secondary sources

I think this individual is borderline on WP:AUTHOR as being widely cited. However, GNG should be clear, beyond the individual's authored works and including their activism, public appearances, education, verifiable biography, etc. —siroχo 10:33, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This person is using Rapid Prompting Method which is Facilitated Communication and as we know that those methods are discredited and authorship is actually the facilitator, that would throw the entire case that they are the author of these claimed works up for question. The article says they are "independent" but that is the claim we hear always from the FC world. Do we have anything independent that is r/s that proves they are truly independent from a facilitator? If this person is truly independent, then they are the first to do so and this would be very big news all over the media. Why don't we see headlines from major news sources? Sgerbic (talk) 21:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, we have very poor reporting on this. There are nonverbal people who communicate through letterboards and tablets without facilitators. From what I can tell, often such people also oppose the use of facilitated communication for the reasons you intimate. But here we have someone who argues in favor of it, but the question is whether they are still using it. I cannot find good sources which indicate one way or another. jps (talk) 22:14, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]