This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Andhra Pradesh / History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). This article was last assessed in January 2014. Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips Military history: Maritime / Asian / South Asia This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force Asian military history task force South Asian military history task force

G’day, good work so far on improving this article. I have a couple of suggestions while you wait for a GA review: AustralianRupert (talk) 23:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• There appears to be a discrepancy between the infobox and the article regarding the vessel’s decommissioning. For instance, the infobox says “27 September 2001”, but the article says “decommissioned on 27 February 2001”. If you could fix this discrepancy, I believe that the article would meet the B-class coverage/accuracy requirements;  Done
• currently there is a bit of information in the infobox that does not appear in the body of the article, and doesn’t appear to be cited with a reference. For instance: the builder information; the 20,000 nmi surfaced or 380 nmi submerged range. If you could add this to the article's body with a reference, I believe that the article would meet the B-class referencing requirements;  Done
• try to avoid repetition. For instance, “As many as 1,500 people visit it everyday during the peak days” and then this “Daily visitors usually range between 500 and 600 and shoot up to 1,500 during the tourist season”. I’d suggest merging those two sentences. Done
• the ASW abbreviation should probably be spelled out fully on first mention for lay readers.  Done Good luck with the review and thanks for your efforts. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 23:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All done, thanks a lot for the quick look. Cheers, ƬheStrikeΣagle ^sorties 05:46, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]