This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Korea Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Trains: Stations Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Hwabon station → Hwabon Station – Improper Capitalization Miffedpenguin (talk) 01:54, 10 December 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). ToadetteEdit (talk) 10:18, 13 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. cyberdog958^Talk 04:47, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. The convention is to not capitalize Station in most cases unless it's demonstrably a proper name. See MOS:NCCAPS. Mackensen (talk) 11:40, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Mackensen's comment seefooddiet (talk) 12:52, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: A majority of english-language sources write it with 'station' capitalized- see Hwabon Station Miffedpenguin (talk) 14:55, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's just not many attestations to the phrase in RS in the first place; keep in mind that Lonely Planet article is WP:UGC so unreliable. It doesn't feel to me like there's a clear WP:COMMONNAME, so it feels better to default to a standard practice. seefooddiet (talk) 07:26, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: No consensus yet. cyberdog958^Talk 04:47, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]