This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Buddhism Mid‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Tibet High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Religion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

• Could you pump up the caption for the opening boffo color image? I see in its commons data there is some text (which you of course are not honor bound to use--in fact, you can change the commons text if you see fit).

• You have many eternal links labeled "to iconographic image of x." Are there some copyright problems that prevent you from actually posting them, or are you leaving out the images for space's sake.

From my (shaky) understanding of wiki's complicated copyright rules, the images are pd because they are ancient, no matter where you found them (who has the copyright on the Mona Lisa?), unless so specified in bizarre litigiousness cases like with the reproductions of the Dead Sea Scrolls.

My suspicion is that the images certainly are free.

Best, --Shlishke (talk) 03:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The question isn't the date of the painting, but the date of the photograph of the painting. Of course proving when the photograph was taken or by whom would be next to impossible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.163.65.123 (talk) 08:41, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• those were put in by someone else last year. I haven't touched the iconography section as of yet. Vajrayosidbhagesuvijahara (talk) 04:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the following books

• http://www.amazon.com/gp/search/ref=sr_adv_b/?search-alias=stripbooks&unfiltered=1&field-keywords=&field-author=&field-title=Hevajra&field-isbn=&field-publisher=&node=&url=&field-feature_browse-bin=&field-binding_browse-bin=&field-subject=&field-language=&field-dateop=&field-datemod=&field-dateyear=&sort=relevancerank&Adv-Srch-Books-Submit.x=17&Adv-Srch-Books-Submit.y=14

--124.78.214.145 (talk) 05:11, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

^^^^^

• http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=Hevajra&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en

--124.78.214.145 (talk) 05:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I read the quote about the origin of the Hevajra Tantra in India on the entry page, I wonder if the person listed as "Saroruha" might be the same as the mahasiddha Saraha?

Could the figure named "Kongtrul" in that same section be Jamgon Kongtrul?

Any thoughts?

AD64 (talk) 17:49, 6 August 2017 (UTC)AD64[reply]

Can anyone provide more of the necessary citations for the information that is in the India section? It is not clear where all this information comes from, especially in the last part of the section.

AD64 (talk) 19:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)AD64[reply]