This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil Rights Movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil Rights Movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil Rights MovementWikipedia:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementTemplate:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about Kansas City, Missouri, and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kansas CityWikipedia:WikiProject Kansas CityTemplate:WikiProject Kansas CityKansas City
This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
This biography is the exact place for giving context to Truman's decision to drop the bombs, or at least his decision not to call off the dropping of the bombs. A global viewpoint would be more appropriate at the article about the bombs. Binksternet (talk) 02:02, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If so, William Shockley's opinion and U.S. Army's document should not be included.
It is reasonable to focus on Truman's views in his own article, but the section also includes the views of his many colleagues and supporters, but very few views of his opponents. I would suggest organize this section like this: the history should appears first, followed by Truman's own views, because this is his own article, so it can have a relatively higher weight. Finally, give the views of his supporters and opponents, and this part should be in a reasonable weight. ——🦝 The InteraccoonaleWill be the raccoon race (talk・contribs) 02:20, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I see it, we give Truman's views, and a brief summary of the arguments of the supporters and opposers. Are there specific sources/quotations you think should be in there? Wehwalt (talk) 12:16, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
William Shockley's opinion and U.S. Army's document are given in detail in the article. It is not "a brief summary". But the opposing opinion only took up one sentence. ——🦝 The InteraccoonaleWill be the raccoon race (talk・contribs) 13:49, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I dropped these text added by Maurnxiao that lacks reliable sources. The one source he provides never mentions Truman in any w and it makes no mention of 1,500,000 dead civilians. Now Maurnxiao has restored his claims and makes his personal opinion that " He personally authorised the vast bombing campaign that slaughtered possibly more than a million civilians and had ultimate authority ov er the actions of America's military in 1st ROK, so the Bodo League massacre belongs here." The source he cites says the opposite--it says that the South Koreans were sovereign in their own country and made the decisions. The source does not claim evidence of approval by the US military and no evidence that Truman ever knew about them. Rjensen (talk) 02:13, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
False. The 1st ROK was was American puppet state carved up after the division of Korea with the Soviets. Eventually the two were meant to unify but the lunacy of Rhee SyngMan, underscored by the massacres perpetrated during his rule, made the process more difficult. And I providedsources showing American authorization of some of the executions. The story was buried by the Korean US-backed military dictatorships that ruled the country basically until 1992. I provided a source that showed Truman authorizing bombing of North Korea, and a historian describing the campaign as a genocide. Maurnxiao (talk) 03:04, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that Maurnxiao does not provide reliable sources, and he misreads what he does have. For US guilt he depends on the daughter of an executed civilians: his source states: "the 57-year-old woman believes South Koreans alone are not to blame. "Although we can't present concrete evidence, we bereaved families believe the United States has some responsibility for this," she told the AP" He does not mention that in the same BBC source we have a much better authority: "Frank Winslow, a military adviser at Daejeon .... "The Koreans were sovereign. To me, there was never any question that the Koreans were in charge," he said in a telephone interview." The US treated Rhee as the final decision maker. Rhee repeatedly rejected US advice during the war--he was not a puppet. For example the US ambassador Muccio insisted that Rhee stay in Seoul early in war (June 25) and he refused. Ambassador Mussio told Rhee NOT to massacre pro-North Korean civilians and Rhee ignored it. Truman and UN did indeed authorize bombing of North Korea--Maurnxiao decides that bombing is "genocide" and invents the notion of 1,5 million civilians killed by US--which reliable source states that? Rjensen (talk) 03:39, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is an outrageous bit of historical revisionism that pretends US military officers are impartial sources and that claims I made up the genocide claim – I specifically cited a historian. The death toll in North Korea is freely available information which you are choosing to ignore. Your own articles bring up American sources estimating the North Korean death toll at around a million and a half. The notion that I made it up is appalling. Maurnxiao (talk) 03:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
First of all--the lead section summarizes the text and does not att new ideas. The changes have to be made first in the section on Korea (section 6.3.2 below). New changes have to be based on scholarship on Truman which is extensive on Korean war. Maurnxiao should read up on Truman if he wants to contribute to the main Wikipedia article on Truman. A good review of the scholarship by Matray appears in https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118300718.ch26Rjensen (talk) 07:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Harry Truman’s middle name was the sole letter “S” therefore it should never be followed by a period. His mother thought he should have a middle name but just chose a letter rather than a full name. TiffanySnow (talk) 15:05, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
