This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / British / European / Napoleonic era C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force British military history task force European military history task force Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815) Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips Shipwrecks Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Shipwreck-related priority open tasks: To Do Lady Elizabeth (1879) Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed! Improve grammar Add any additions if needed Still adding more information Discuss desired additions -None Arctic Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arctic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arctic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Antarctica High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Canada: Nunavut / History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian Territories. This article is supported by WikiProject History of Canada. United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

They just found what appears to be the wreck (check the front page) So is it ok for me to remove it from the missing ships category?layla 14:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Layla, the remover (talk • contribs)

I do not see why not. Found is found.TH1980 (talk) 17:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article claims HMS Terror was found at position 68°54′13″N 98°56′18″W. May I ask for the source of this claim? No cited source states its position in terms of langitude and longitude. --Radouch (talk) 13:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that as being the location Terror Bay rather the ship. I tied to make it clearer. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on HMS Terror (1813). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131005145419/http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=4969 to http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=4969
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050924044854/http://www.pc.gc.ca/docs/r/system-reseau/sec7/sites-lieux79_e.asp to http://www.pc.gc.ca/docs/r/system-reseau/sec7/sites-lieux79_e.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060529114414/http://www.pc.gc.ca/docs/r/system-reseau/sec6/sites-lieux74_e.asp to http://www.pc.gc.ca/docs/r/system-reseau/sec6/sites-lieux74_e.asp
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nypress.com/15/5/news%26columns/oldsmoke.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Erebus and Terror had screws that could be pulled out of the water for protection against the ice, similar to here:

Broichmore (talk) 12:00, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I might re-write this section with events in chronological order. From inuit accounts of a silhouette of the ships mast being seen at sunset from the shore, sightings from aircraft and the visit to the site by Sammy Kogvik and "Uncle James". One web page quotes Adrian Schimnowski, (the RV Martin Bergmann ship’s director), "The credit for the Terror find rests with Kogvik, Schimnowski said, and all the Inuit testimony gathered over generations that correctly identified the locations of the Terror and Erebus." On another web page Kogvik said, "Oh yeah, I heard a lot of stories about Terror, the ships, but I guess Parks Canada don't listen to people," Kogvik is also reported as saying "They (people from the South) just ignore Inuit stories about the Terror ship." I think it would be more accurate to say the Arctic Research Foundation team didn't find the Terror, they just confirmed its location to the wider World.81.131.132.199 (talk) 17:58, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]