This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean
Whever I start a page, I am really luck people come and enhance it. I am expecting it. I had only one source on this, I am sorry. Let's share the knowledge. KennedyBroseguini (talk) 03:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for creating this article! I'm marking it as reviewed, but this really needs improved sourcing. One essential thing would be to include the publisher and an ISBN or DOI for the Williams source. I was not able to figure out which book with this title was being used, which would be essential for verifying the information. In improving the article, there do seem to be quite a few high quality sources out there including this, this, and also this which has some interesting sociolinguistic information.