Talk:Greece runestones
Greece runestones is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 9, 2009. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
30 stones?
What is the purpose in saying "about 30 stones"? Does no one know exactly how many there are? The article describes 30 stones. Are there more? If not, the statement should say "there are 30 stones." This is, after all, a scientific article. Caeruleancentaur (talk) 11:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- On some stones, some runes are damaged so that we cannot be 100% certain that they referred to Greece. We also have U 153 that may mention Greece, but Rundata 2.5 does not include that interpretation. There is also U 925 where "south" may refer to Greece, but we don't know (see U 922). In all likelihood there are undiscovered stones to be discovered as well.--Berig (talk) 11:49, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
An expression of gratitude
What a wonderful article. And it leads onto the other Runestone articles, which are also of great interest. Very many thanks to the editor(s). 45ossington (talk) 12:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, for telling me you like it :)--Berig (talk) 12:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Magical stones?
Didn't quite understand this sentence:
"On these runestones the word Grikkland the runestones are magical and psychedlic with effects similar to magic shrooms..."
wtf? Ugluspegill (talk) 16:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- This was an act of vandalism done by an anonymous contributor, which has later been reverted. The sentence is meant to say "On these runestones the word Grikkland (Greece) appears in three inscriptions," (diff and vandalized version) –Holt (T•C) 16:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC
Capitalization
Why the capitalization? Isn't the article Greece runestones, even in a world where "Greece" is an adjective?--Wetman (talk) 16:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think you are probably right. I was influenced by the name of the Kensington Runestone, the only "runestone" that can be said to have an established English name.--Berig (talk) 17:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Compare with Rökstenen and "Rök Runestone", which is a direct translation of a proper noun. Since greklandsstenar is not a proper noun, it probably should be "Greece runestones". –Holt (T•C) 17:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- I have been thinking of this for a while actually, and also of whether other similar article names (e.g. England Runestones) should be uncapitalized. I think I'll do it tomorrow, so I won't cause any problems while the article is on the main page.--Berig (talk) 17:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Compare with Rökstenen and "Rök Runestone", which is a direct translation of a proper noun. Since greklandsstenar is not a proper noun, it probably should be "Greece runestones". –Holt (T•C) 17:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
At Ög 81 the word Holmi is mentioned - Can it be Holmgård instead of Borgholm or a duel?
I think "Holmi" can be Holmgård which is the old name for Novgorod? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.226.222.111 (talk) 20:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Greece runestones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110225031159/http://www.sofi.se/servlet/GetDoc?meta_id=1472 to http://www.sofi.se/servlet/GetDoc?meta_id=1472
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)