This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Soviet Union Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Russia: Technology & engineering / Economy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force. This article is supported by the economy of Russia task force. Cryptography: Computer science Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Mid-importance).

The article mentions a 2^100 attack on AES, not mentioning which AES is attacked. The reference (XLS-attack) does not mention the 2^100 and the AES article does not mentionen it..... So either the EAS article needs an update or this references need to be reworked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:6B:970:F361:8803:6E06:563A:8596 (talk) 08:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have removed the comparison to AES. The 2¹⁰⁰ claim was apparently based on the controversial XSL attack, which in reality appears to not apply to AES. -- intgr [talk] 09:04, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GOST (block cipher). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://now.cs.berkeley.edu/~daw/papers/advslide-ec00.ps
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6CjwhX8tY?url=http://gostshifr.narod.ru/ to http://gostshifr.url.ph/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]