This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Classical Greece and Rome High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

The link to Titus Flavius Clemens redirects to the Christian theologian, not the consul as it should. Stephen C. Carlson (talk) 08:59, 5 October 2006

There should be a note that "Flavius" in the 4th, 5th & IIRC 6th centuries did not refer to the gens Flavia, but was more of a title adopted by people claiming a mid-level status with some kind of military overtones. Benet Salway, in his Journal of Roman Studies article, does an excellent job of explaining how it derived from the dynastic name of Constantine the Great -- & its later use has nothing to do with the gens. -- llywrch (talk) 03:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to clarify how it was used in the article. The lead section was meant to cover this. However, I feel it's only fair to point out that a huge number of people did have Flavius as a nomen gentilicium, and in that sense they were part of gentes of that name, even though they might not have been descended from the Flavii of the Republic (or even related to each other). After a few generations, families of this name would likely be indistinguishable from one another. It's also impossible to know in many cases whether the name arrived in someone's style as the result of direct descent from any family of this name, or whether it was adopted by the particular individual who bore it. That presents a challenge for this article, since no other gens article attempts to distinguish between genuine descendants of an ancient family and persons bearing the same nomen under the later Empire, but including everyone known by Flavius here seems impractical. P Aculeius (talk) 06:18, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

barbarian successor kingdoms of Italy in the lead links to a disambiguation page, and needs to be disambiguated to the germane kingdoms. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 20:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]