This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Montana This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I've added additional info and will continue to do so as I research a bit more.

--Smylere Snape 16:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The text of this article seems disturbingly close to the text of the linked obituary. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.164.41.112 (talk • contribs).

Am I the only one who's bothered by the fact that something published by the Institute for Historical Review is cited as a reference here? The fact that they're clearly marked as a holocaust denial organisation seems to suggest that their writings were taken with a grain of salt, but they are clearly not a reliable source.

Given that the text does not include footnotes that specify which claims come from which source, the whole thing just bothers me. The article itself does not immediately seem unbalanced, but I still think someone should go over this with a critical eye and make sure that everything contained in here is properly sourced. -- Schneelocke 14:38, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Institute for Historical Review' is not a 'holocaust denial' organisation, but rather an institute which seeks to throw more light on recent historical subjects which the mainstream establishment writers fail to acknowledge.

The quoted article is reliable and there are indeed source notes to be found in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by UKLOUISE (talk • contribs) 10:57, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]