This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. Alabama This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can , or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama Journalism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Women writers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This clearly seems to be an article written by that Elizabeth Spiers herself. It should be removed for lack of relevance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.244.239 (talk) 05:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree. It is very clearly written because a person like this is dead-in-the-water if they do not have enough publicity. And the status of being included on "Wikipedia" would add some substance, to (if you go to her website) someone who clearly lacks it. For obvious reasons, this article should be removed. They may be important to their friends hanging out in a clique in Manhattan, but certainly do not warrant mention on Wikipedia... While this may be harsh their presence on Wikipedia is almost entirely based on their need for elevated self-importance... Stevenmitchell (talk) 16:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]

It may have relevance as part of the Web world, but that needs explanation - how and why are any of these blogs "influential"? What does that mean for those industries? What did the gossip consist of? There could be an article, but it needs expansion and providing context.Parkwells (talk) 19:08, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Elizabeth Spiers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070323010340/http://www.supermogul.com:80/ to http://supermogul.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elizabeth Spiers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130915223843/http://www.businessweek.com:80/innovate/FineOnMedia/archives/2007/04/elizabeth_spier_1.html to http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/FineOnMedia/archives/2007/04/elizabeth_spier_1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]