This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Michigan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / Post-Cold War C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Post-Cold War task force Firearms Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

User:Jadechristal made some additions in 2005 which were littered with sales jargon and undue praise for the awesome glory of EOTech. Since he had made no edits before or since, I assumed he was a hired goon trying to push his wares on Wikipedia, and have therefore cut down/re-worded a good portion of his edits. If you think that was unjustified, discuss it here. - Tronno ( t | c ) 11:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted the "sales pitch" edit by 64.65.172.65. The Wiki article on red dot sights is both well-developed and linked to (twice) in this article. Kolbasz 22:06, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anybody know any (non-proprietary) information regarding the holographic dot projection scheme, and its difference from the standard "red-dot" scheme? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.218.1.215 (talk) 00:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article is in need of some real technical information. If I get around to it i'll try to make a diagram based on the patent drawings. Simply linking to 'red dot sight' is unsuitable because the technology is different. In the meantime, see external links for the patent info. ExtremeSquared (talk) 00:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Made a diagram, i hope nobody is offended by me leaving this article in a somewhat sloppy shape until i get around to writing a technical explanation. ExtremeSquared (talk) 21:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article claims that this projects a holographic image of a reticle. It's a common misunderstanding that holograms are projections but they are not. (Look at the wikipedia article on holograms and the only place the word "projection" occurs is in the movie & TV show appearace section.)Laserlight1234 (talk) 21:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://soldiersystems.net/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Final-SAFETY-OF-USE-MESSAGE-14-September-2015-Copy.pdf http://soldiersystems.net/2015/12/08/l3-communications-eotech-issuing-refunds-for-holographic-weapon-sights/

--Sonaz (talk) 22:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article claims that laser diodes require more complex electronics, but this is not true. 74.69.88.134 (talk) 17:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have multiple edits recently to correct factually inaccurate information. Can someone explain why these edits have been reverted each time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EOT2.0! (talk • contribs) 20:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The information is sourced. We don't draw inferences from sources, we just state what they say. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 21:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]