This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Insects: Ants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Ant task force (assessed as High-importance).

@Jonkerz:, thought I'd ping you for this one. Major taxonomic changes have occurred; 28 genera (27 extant and 1 extinct) are now recognized, an increase from 20 in the previous classification scheme. Two new genera are proposed, 8 are removed from synonymy and 7 are placed in synonymy. Source is found here. Burklemore1 (talk) 14:22, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh noooo not again! :) thanks for the ping btw, Burklemore1. I haven't kept up with the latest taxonomy, but this is something we must fix. I'll add it to the todo. jonkerz ♠talk 05:47, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, the subfamilies seem to be having a major revamp or something. I have updated the genera list in accordance to the changes though. :) Burklemore1 (talk) 05:53, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the main article[1]. Not done yet:

• Amyrmex synonym of Leptanilloides [2]
• Asphinctanilloides synonym of Leptanilloides [3]
• More...

jonkerz ♠talk 03:48, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]