This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Internet culture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Sociology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

From VfD:

The name rings a bell, but I still think the article is unencyclopedic. [[User:Supadawg|supadawg - ]] 14:05, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

• Delete: Nonce word formed on the pattern of "literati." Spirits who understand computers? Lemon curry? Geogre 15:24, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Hang on, folks! Ok, it's in use. Is it a dictdef? :-) Two issues, here. Geogre 17:56, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
    • Although it's a lexicographicism now, and not a very good one, implicit in my keep vote below is my agreement with Mindspillage that "an encyclopedic article could be written." In fact this is an article which I think is reasonably likely to grow to at least a stub. It's sort of part and parcel of the dot-com era. You'll notice that AHD4 didn't say where it originated, yet one imagines that it's a coinage that could very likely be traced, and that in itself would be a worthwhile sentence or two. Incidentally, I always thought the reference was to "glitterati," not directly to "literati." [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 18:56, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. The article as it stands is terrible, yes, but the term is in reasonably widespread use, and I think an encyclopedic article could be written. Mindspillage 15:41, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, for reasons given by Mindspillage I think it was invented or at least popularized in Wired magazine, way back when I still had a print subscription to it (five years or more). Hmm... First mention in Google Groups was in 1992: Who are the "digerati"? ... "The article referred to the "digerati". I'm fascinated by this new (to me) word. Does it mean 'people from Digital' or 'computer people'?" The writer refers to "Earlier this week, the New York Times carried an article about George Gilder's article in Upside magazine" so perhaps it's a Gilder coinage. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 17:01, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC) It's in AHD4! Digerati,

PLURAL NOUN: People who are knowledgeable about digital technologies such as computer programming and design: “the chasm between the high claims of the digerati and the misadventures of the novice Net user” (Publisher's Weekly, Publisher's Weekly July 17, 1995). ETYMOLOGY: dig(ital) + (lit)erati.

• Keep - rewrote and wikified. Still a short stub though. -Sean Curtin 19:05, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Still borderline on a dicdef as rewritten IMO, but does no harm and may grow. Give it a chance. Andrewa 20:04, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I've added a list of people who have been named as digerati. A list! A list! Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of edit war! You'll never delete it now! Bwahahahahaha! Notice. The preceding comment is a joke. Smiley follows. :-)

• Keep. In reasonably common use, and can possibly grow beyond the current dictdef. — Gwalla | Talk 02:51, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion

There was an abusive and inappropriate passage about an internet paedophile called Digerati, which I removed. It also says in a more encyclopaedic way that Digerati is the name of an internet paedophile. If this is true and well-attested, maybe we should keep it. I don't know anything about this person. Michael Keats 20:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Digerati. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070729234559/http://www.hybridvigor.org/people.html to http://www.hybridvigor.org/people.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:39, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]