This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tibet High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Buddhism Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yes, it should be merged with "Dharma Protectors". Dharmapala literally means Dharma Protector.

Yes I agree also please merge it!

Fully agree they should be merged rudy

"Dharma Protector" re-directs to this article Chris Fynn (talk) 13:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mahakala is not a single Dharma Protector but a class of Dharma Protector. See e.g. http://www.himalayanart.org/pages/mahakala/index.html. Chris Fynn (talk) 13:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Buddhist Worldly Protector: Rahula

I would like to mention at least one of them within the article, but I don't know how and where exactly to get them inserted. There doesn't seem to be a place.

Austerlitz -- 88.75.211.138 (talk) 13:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• [1] This source claims that the first Buddhist protectors originate with the Pali Sutras and later occur in the Mahayana Sutras. Is it possible to retrieve this kind of Sutras?

Austerlitz -- 88.75.202.224 (talk) 12:35, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:See also suggests that "Editors should provide a brief annotation when a link's relevance is not immediately apparent." I would like to request this as the Anonymous group's relevance to this article is not apparent: they are not Buddhists, they are not motivated by bodhichitta (the wish to become a Buddha for the benefit of all sentient beings), Dharmapalas do not act "anonymously" behind masks/hidden identities, etc. Dharmapalas are the "guardian angels" of Tibetan Buddhism, protecting a person's spiritual realizations; as such, Dharmapalas have no interest in worldly concerns. So, I do not see how Anonymous is a modern-day example of a Dharmapala, neither in terms of motivation or method. It is a rather spurious comparison. Amplifying Life (talk) 14:19, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dharmapala is a common name. See Dharmapala (disambiguation).

The obscure Buddhist deity described here (according to the creator of this page) cannot be the WP:PTOPIC for this name. So, I will rename it. What should the new name be?

• Dharmapala (Buddhism)
• Dharmapala (Buddhist deity)

Please provide feedback. If there is no feedback, I will go with the first choice. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 07:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]