This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
@Innisfree987: This is true, and reliance on primary sources is very much something we wish to avoid. However, bad referencing and a lack of reliable sources doesn't mean the content of the article is spam/advertising, so I have little option but to decline the speedy deletion request under WP:G11. There might, however, be a case for speedy deleting this article under WP:A7 or seeking consensus for deletion at WP:AFD. WaggersTALK12:05, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Waggers, I appreciate the reply. To me, between the insertion of the fundraising page that was in no way needed as a reference and the fact that 80% of the prose came not just from any primary sources but from the organization's own page meant when tagged, the entry in its current form it serves only to...publicise an entity...and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic. But perhaps someone will wish to do that rewrite; in the meantime I removed the OR, tagged for notability and unreviewed so we'll see if someone else has a further opinion, or interest in improving the entry (if there are sources to do so). Innisfree987 (talk) 15:39, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Organization location
Is it fully accurate to list the organization's location as Charlotte metro area? Would it not be more accurate and encyclopedic for the organization to reflect where it actually operates from, in Albemarle, NC? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:A000:1218:6082:5544:D57A:7FA0:1ED6 (talk) 17:37, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
