This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
This wikipage - as well as the Sensing Murder page - come across as unbalanced and disparaging towards their subjects. I realise that Wikipedia is hostile towards non-physicalist phenomena, but couldn't it at least attempt to be neutral? If you picked holes in orthodox scientific claims in the same way (and holes can always be picked), and emphasised negatives/doubts you'd be accused of being conspiracy theorists - so there is a double standard operating. 121.73.7.84 (talk) 16:01, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
X
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung