This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
All of the sources for this article were checked, and full descriptions of each subsequent edit made appear in the corresponding edit summary. The only clarification that needs to be offered is the appearance of the [sic] in the first citation, which is to make clear the errant appearance of "Dr." (in reference to the honorary doctorate of the subject) before the title bestowed by the Crown is a mistake that appears on the source website, and is was not introduced by this editor. For background, see [1], and similar UK sources. Also, if "Kenya-based British" in the lede is not better than the obscuring "Kenyan British"—i.e., if she has dual citizenship—then this particular edit should be reversed. 71.239.87.100 (talk) 17:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Richly sourced subject, poorly sourced article
In the 30 mins I could spend on this, I found one source to support the claim of the Smithsonian honour, and provided a half dozen Further reading entries for future editors to begin working from. (Please do not stop there; these hardly span 2013-2014, and so do not well source the MBE, the honourary doctorate, etc.) There is no reason such a richly sourced contemporary individual should have such a poorly sourced Wikipedia article. 71.239.87.100 (talk) 17:18, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung