This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Islam Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

In the article for the author, this is referred to as a work of jurisprudence (fiqh); yet here it is referred to as a book of hadith. I think this requires further research for secondary sources to pin it down. I really wish I had a copy of the book or could find an ecopy, as while it would count as a primary source and wouldn't be preferable for use in the article, being able to read it would certainly help in bulking up the article. MezzoMezzo (talk) 12:01, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point. According to this source, its full name is دعائم الإسلام، وذكر الحلال والحرام , which suggests it is a fiqh book (the source says Ali az-Zahir would give rewards for whoever memorised it). But yes you are right more sources are needed.--Aa2-2004 (talk)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daim al-Islam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723030917/http://www.bohra.net/archive/qadi.html to http://www.bohra.net/archive/qadi.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:28, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]