This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Fortifications / Technology / British / European / Medieval C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. Associated task forces: /  Fortifications task force Military science, technology, and theory task force British military history task force European military history task force Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500) Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. UK geography Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Whether the "It" that was destroyed in WW2 is the gate or the surrounding region of the same name is not clear. --130.209.241.193 (talk) 16:02, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Changed "It" to "The area". David (talk) 16:31, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't the slightest doubt that Crepelgate (Crepel meaning a covered passage or tunnel) is the original name as its use predates Cripplegate by centuries. It was originally a postern gate cut through the wall so this makes perfect sense. St Giles (patron saint of cripples) was only so named after the name had been corrupted and its original meaning forgotten.TheMathemagician (talk) 14:43, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The argument was made by E. C. Jones (Saint Gilles, essai d'histoire littéraire, 1914) that this false etymology led to a change in the life of Saint Gilles as told in medieval literature. Prior to the association of Gilles with Cripplegate, his injury from the arrow wasn't specified. But in some vernacular texts, the arrow hits Gille's leg, or thigh, or knee, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.71.226 (talk) 05:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you my anonymous but erudite friend. My earlier comment was slightly incomplete - the passage or tunnel (crepel) actually led from the Wall to a barbican (an external fortification).TheMathemagician (talk) 16:35, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://h2g2.com/approved_entry/A2430235. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:38, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cripplegate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110612211407/http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/committees/ward_newsletters/15.pdf to http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/committees/ward_newsletters/15.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]