This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Government This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States This redirect is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance). Psychology This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology Law This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw New York (state) This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)

These two articles are covering the same thing and I suggest they be merged. deisenbe (talk) 11:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deisenbe, and which article title do you suggest we use? Keep WP:Common name in mind. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since you reverted my renaming the one article I have nothing further to contribute at this time. deisenbe (talk) 13:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I gave valid reasoning for reverting your move of that article. And that move should have no bearing on this merge discussion, but we both know how upset you get when I revert you and give you valid reasoning for reverting you. Your merge tag can remain for years. Instead, I will see about removing it after two months. Of course, you could simply start a WP:RfC on whether or not the articles should be merged or a WP:Requested moves discussion. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge with Sexually violent predator laws, suggesting that Civil confinement would be the better target. Both articles cover the same topic, and there is only one outcome: that of civil confinement. The laws leading to that outcome could really be covered under that heading. Klbrain (talk) 00:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]