This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation C‑class This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC C This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. This article was accepted on 2 September 2008 by reviewer MSGJ (talk · contribs). Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Internet Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

More clearer view needed ? Please read the article and discuss if you think it conveys the correct message, thanks ! Thrill59 (talk) 16:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's looking good! The references are particularly impressive. I have to say though that I don't understand much of it. It would be nice if the first paragraph gave a little more context and explained it in easier terms. Keep up the good work, Martin 20:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added a great deal more information, and clarified some parts. Included an image to 'get the picture' early on - hope this does what it should do, Thrill59 (talk) 08:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on CE-HTML. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081209093217/http://www.ce.org:80/Standards/CEA-2014-A_Errata_TextOnly.pdf to http://www.ce.org/Standards/CEA-2014-A_Errata_TextOnly.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:52, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on CE-HTML. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608190846/http://www.ce.org/Standards/browseByCommittee_2757.asp to http://www.ce.org/Standards/browseByCommittee_2757.asp
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4534279458.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110710164938/http://discover.sonystyle.com/internettv/ to http://discover.sonystyle.com/internettv/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS8497272379.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]