Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Brenner Base Tunnel

--Dokoenig (talk) 14:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ÖBB’s 15 kV frequency

The text of the Railroad Gazette article: Brenner base tunnel approved

"Power supply will be at 25 kV 50 Hz, with changeover from ÖBB’s 15 kV 167 Hz in approach tunnels at each end."

appears to have omitted a period thereby creating "167Hz" instead of the probably intended "16.7Hz" as cited at Austrian Federal Railways. SBaker43 (talk) 06:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brenner Base Tunnel reached the construction phase

The Brenner-base-tunnel has past its planned phase and is now in the construction phase. This is since the final go ahead sign was given in Innsbruck on April 18th, 2011. EU coordinator Pat Cox spoke in German language that day "With this step we have reached the point of no return. The coming of the Brenner Base Tunnel is definitive and the main construction phase of the 55 km long base-tunnel has already started. --145.53.144.81 (talk) 16:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Second longest tunnel in the world

It actually will be the longest tunnel in the world, as the Innsbruck_bypass together with the BBT accumulates to some 64 km of continuous tunnel. BBT Basic data

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brenner Base Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:51, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brenner Base Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:23, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the tunnel not flat?

Ok, this is more a personal curiosity, but it could also be added to the page: why does the tunnel have to climb up and have an apex? Why couldn't they just make it flat? I googled around a bit, but found no answer. Nasopanic (talk) 17:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Innsbruck is at a height of 600 m above sea level, Franzensfeste at 750 m, so an entirely "flat" tunnel wasn't an option anyway. Additionally, a major concern for any tunnel of this length is dealing with potential water ingress, so having an incline will help avoiding a situation where the tunnel is partially flooded. And since Austria and Italy wanted to make sure, that water remains on their respective national territories, the apex was built exactly at the border. Mai-Sachme (talk) 08:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the clear explanation :) Nasopanic (talk) 11:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Having a slope to one or both ends means that gravity is all that's needed to drain the water out. Contrast that with a similar length tunnel like the Channel Tunnel where it is forced to have its lowest point in the middle. I believe they have to constantly pump out about 100 litres of water per second to keep the channel tunnel dry.
StuZealand (talk) 09:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Brenner_Base_Tunnel