Bradley Joseph is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 24, 2008.
Article milestones Date Process Result December 21, 2006 Good article nominee Listed June 1, 2007 Featured article candidate Promoted December 11, 2021 Featured article review Demoted
Current status: Former featured article

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Mid-importance). Classical music This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music Composers This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers Jazz Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Minnesota Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pop music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject American music (assessed as Low-importance). This article has been selected for use on the United States portal.

See non-free content review. ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 01:24, 18 April 2013 (UTCIS

• Discussion is closed. ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 02:50, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 8 external links on Bradley Joseph. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.serve.com/gregl7/bradley.htm
• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.willmar.k12.mn.us/content/3rd-annual-wps-arts-academics-gala-1
• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.windandwire.com/february/the_journey_continues.htm
• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www2.bitstream.net/~billb/bradley_joseph.htm
• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www2.bitstream.net/~billb/bradley_joseph.htm
• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://midasrecords.com/news-detail.php?pageid=690322&newsid=1702
• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://jaycees.willmarnet.com/bradley.joseph.html
• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://newfaceofjazz.com/?page_id=594

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bradley Joseph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bradleyjoseph.com/billboard.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:42, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Bradley Joseph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140201134329/http://brainerddispatch.com/stories/070899/tem_0708990012.shtml to http://brainerddispatch.com/stories/070899/tem_0708990012.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140111071610/http://brainerddispatch.com/stories/071599/tem_0715990007.shtml to http://brainerddispatch.com/stories/071599/tem_0715990007.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060925050303/http://www.countryroads.net/showgo/storytest.cfm?story_ID=1418 to http://www.countryroads.net/showgo/storytest.cfm?story_ID=1418
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070107102737/http://www.newagereporter.com/home/welcome.asp to http://www.newagereporter.com/home/welcome.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719131819/http://www.xtrememusic.org/world/joseph_bradley.pdf to http://www.xtrememusic.org/world/joseph_bradley.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bradley Joseph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070509103758/http://www.irnha.org/the.store?cart_id=5565261.31938&page=%2Fcatalog%2FIRNHAproducts.html to http://www.irnha.org/the.store?cart_id=5565261.31938&page=%2Fcatalog%2FIRNHAproducts.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article does not appear to meet 2020 WP:WIAFA criteria. While it is well sourced, it relies heavily on primary sources, is crammed with quotations, and the sections "Thoughts on success as an independent artist" and "On composing" read like paid, promotional blurbs in a magazine.

The "Yanni" section feels like a case of WP:UNDUE, and statements like "He readily credits Yanni's role in his professional development, and for five years of irreplaceable experiences and memories" are unencyclopedic and border on trivia. Statements like "Active since 1983, Joseph has performed in front of millions of people around the world" do not belong in the lead and tell the reader nothing about the subject's significance. It's hard to believe that Bradley Joseph's music has received nothing but acclaim and critical accolades, yet that is the impression one gets from the article. There are also various MOS: issues, including WP:OVERLINK, MOS:HASH, MOS:DASH and ellipsis usage.

The main contributor to this entry (who nominated it for FA status in 2007) has not edited Wikipedia since 2014 and no one appears to be maintaining the article. Unless these issues are addressed in the near future, the article should be taken to WP:FAR. Toccata quarta (talk) 10:12, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Toccata quarta: were your concerns about this article addressed? I still see lots of primary sources, PRs, and other potentially unreliable sources used as references in this article. If the article is still not reaching the featured article criteria, can you nominate it for WP:FAR? Thanks. Z1720 (talk) 19:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: Not as far as I can tell. Can I take it to FAR right away? I have listed it at Wikipedia:Unreviewed featured articles/2020, but the instructions on that page are as confusing as they come, and I'm not sure if I should notify the article's main editor (who has not edited Wikipedia since 2014) or if this talk page section suffices. Thank you. Toccata quarta (talk) 06:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Toccata quarta: Yes, you can list the article at WP:FAR. This will begin the official review process for the article, and after the review, editors may decide to delist the article. There are instructions at the top of FAR on how to post a new nomination: if you follow those instructions, I or other editors will worry about URFA/2020 and other steps. I would mention in your nomination that this is your first FAR, so that the co-ords double-check and ensure everything is done correctly. Z1720 (talk) 16:14, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like someone listed out every instrument in the infobox that the subject has ever played when the instruments in the infobox should be limited to those the subject is best known for, and in this case, it would be "keyboards". Having said that, I'm gonna go ahead and edit the infobox accordingly, unless maybe there's already consensus for all the instruments currently listed in the infobox.2601:153:881:3D60:B51E:8727:3029:1A47 (talk) 00:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]