This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yugoslavia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia
In the last year, the long-standing 1 killed casualty statistic for the Serb paramilitaries was changed to 3 killed, citing sources from the 1990s. Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Academy/The effect of aging sources provides a good explanation for why this isn't a best practice when more recent sources are available. During Seselj's trial at the ICTY, it was stated that Milic was the only casualty on the Serb side. [1] Moreover, the White Eagles monument in Borovo Selo only mentions Milic's name. [2] Hence, I have decided to be WP:BOLD and revert the change. Open to discuss. Best, Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
X
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung