This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Religious texts (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts Bible Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Judaism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Ancient Near East Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Phoenicia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Deuteronomy has nothing to do with Christianity. The opening sentence, which says, "the fifth book of the Christian Old Testament" deserves further explanation.

I'm concerned that whoever wrote or amended this page has misconstrued the history of this book. To say that the book of Joshua was created in response to their exile is pure fantasy. The book of Joshua if redacted during the exile, was obviously based on earlier works. The author of this page completely disregards any alternative perspective on authorship and historicity. 220.233.33.91 (talk) 23:29, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, we're biased for the WP:CHOPSY perspective and tend to eliminate from our article the POV of Bible thumpers.

Nothing Fails Like Bible History 10: Joshua, Jericho, & Genocide on YouTube

Yale Bible Study, Joshua and Judges: Part 1, The Historical Problem of Conquest on YouTube

Besides, a thesis that enjoys broad academic consensus for at least several decades cannot be called "revisionism" in any meaningful meaning. Calling it "revisionism" is an attempt to throw dirt at it, but in fact you make manifest your own abysmal ignorance of mainstream Bible scholarship. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:37, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The author of this section is mistaken about the traditions brought to Judah by Israelite refugees. Israelites did not worship Yahweh. Israelites worshiped El. The origins of Yahweh are Midianite.

ref: https://www.thetorah.com/article/yhwh-the-original-arabic-meaning-of-the-name?fbclid=IwAR3yeFfQIJG035xNmEIeNCqCjTj7TKIQCQODshNEFG0UxoPUHNeJRAg17YA

What the Israelites did bring to Judah, were the legends of the patriarchs and the story of Joseph.

When the Priestly scribes subsequently began compiling these Israelite, Judean, and Deuteronomist sources into Torah, they were the ones who connected the dots from Joseph to Moses. Spodvoll (talk) 16:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The huge influence of the Deuteronomy on Islam. List of laws in the Qur'an directly inspired by the laws in Deuteronomy. 109.245.34.138 (talk) 21:58, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Picture of a Hebrew Manuscript at the Beginning of the article shows the first verse of the book of Joshua. I don't know if that is important or not, but it might be interesting to have a picture of the first few verses of Deuteronomy since that is the subject of the article. Mark McDonnel (talk) 06:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]