Blue whale is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 24, 2005.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 18, 2005 Featured article candidate Promoted April 22, 2006 Featured article review Kept July 9, 2007 Featured article review Kept
Current status: Featured article

This  level-4 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 9 April 2021.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors Spoken Wikipedia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia Cetaceans (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cetaceans, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CetaceansWikipedia:WikiProject CetaceansTemplate:WikiProject CetaceansCetaceans Mammals Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Marine life (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Ywaz, you do need to realize that "catch" is the standard terminology used in all wildlife harvesting (which is what whaling is, Japanese pretensions notwithstanding). We don't speak about "killing" fish either. I appreciate that whales elicit a more emotional response, but when our articles on whaling overwhelmingly use "catch", this looks incongruous at the least. --Elmidae (talk · contribs)

In the article it states "Pregnant females gain roughly four percent of their body weight daily,[86] amounting to 60% of their overall body weight throughout summer foraging periods."

However, that is clearly not right, as this would mean that female whales approximately triple/quadruple their weight every month. You can see how that would lead to bizarre situations.

I am not aware of what this figure should be or what the author was thinking when writing this. Perhaps they meant eat 4% of body weight.

According to this new study a blue whale could potential reach 270 tons or more.

https://peerj.com/articles/16978/ Wilt Carter (talk) 18:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given the tier of article this is, I'm asking here rather than just editing, but I feel the recent description of Ichthyotitan should be added to Note A at the end of the second sentence of the introduction. This has already been added to the introduction of Largest and heaviest animals as a caveat to the blue whale's status as the largest animal ever known to have existed. Given the estimates for the size of the Aust specimen put its likely weight (not yet formally estimated) as equal to or greater than the blue whale's, I'd suggest that this take precedence in the note over the estimates of Perucetus' size and weight, which are at present controversial.

I feel this information could also be added to the "Size" section of the article, as it only mentions "certain shastasaurid icthyosaurs" at present, so it seems it would benefit from the more formal description of Icthyotitan being added. FreeBard42 (talk) 13:11, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]