Black Stone has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 10, 2012 Good article nominee Listed

This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Islam Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Saudi Arabia High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

According to Islam, it is placed there By Prophet Abraham AS, Jibreel (Gabriel) brought it from heaven directly to Abraham who built the Kaaba. 69.94.41.101 (talk) 12:46, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This tradition is already stated in the article as written. According to the New Encyclopedia of Islam, "Tradition says that Adam placed it in the original Ka'bah. Later it was hidden in the mountain of Abu Qubays. When Abraham rebuilt the Ka'bah, the Angel Gabriel brought the stone out and gave it to him." (pg. 91) -- FPTI (talk) 01:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there no primary source/reference? 'tradition' is very vague (i hate that term). I demand a source from a book of the sunnah Formerlychucks (talk) 15:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Formerlychucks It is great to hear that you demand a source from the book of the Sunnah. If you find one, please put it in immediately! FPTI (talk) 21:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The illustration used in the history is not at all acceptable. And it's hurting Muslim sentiments. Kindly remove the illustration. 103.82.252.232 (talk) 09:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the notice on the top of the talk page says, Attention: If you are here to talk about removing images of Muhammad from Wikipedia articles, please read this article carefully: Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam/Images of Muhammad. Wikipedia is not censored. Thanks. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s hurting Muslim sentiments. Remove the illustration. 103.82.252.232 (talk) 09:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the notice on the top of the talk page says, Attention: If you are here to talk about removing images of Muhammad from Wikipedia articles, please read this article carefully: Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam/Images of Muhammad. Wikipedia is not censored. Thanks. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change " The stone is also thought to be associated with Allat.[35] Muhammad is said to have called the stone "the right hand of al-Rahman"" to "Muhammad is said to have called the stone "the right hand of al-Rahman""

removing the line associated with the source 35. The source reads: "such as Allat's block of granite in her hima at Taif and the black stone in..." This means that a distinction is made between Allat and the black stone. The Wikipedia article assumes that they are the same. Reference 35 has to be removed because it is false. Scholarforpeace (talk) 18:54, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]